• Home
  • What we offer
  • How we match
  • Applications
  • About us
  • What is mentorship?
  • Quick Tips
  • Resources
  • More
    • Home
    • What we offer
    • How we match
    • Applications
    • About us
    • What is mentorship?
    • Quick Tips
    • Resources
  • Home
  • What we offer
  • How we match
  • Applications
  • About us
  • What is mentorship?
  • Quick Tips
  • Resources

How We Match

Most mentorship programs rely on availability, first-come sign-ups, or informal selection. We don’t.

Our matching process is intentionally designed to balance alignment, capacity, and equity across the entire cohort—rather than optimizing for any single preference or outcome. Mentors and students apply separately through structured applications, and each pairing is constructed using a consistent decision process to ensure consistency and fairness at scale.


Behind the scenes, To be an MD uses PairScore as an internal matching tool to support — but not replace — human reviewEvery match is reviewed before confirmation, allowing us to honor individual needs while protecting the integrity of the cohort as a whole.


This approach enables thoughtful, defensible matches that work not just for individuals, but for programs long-term.

Fit Over Randomness

Fit Over Randomness

Fit Over Randomness

Matches are based on alignment across background, goals, interests, and support needs — not first-come, first-served.

Capacity Matters

Fit Over Randomness

Fit Over Randomness

Mentor availability and bandwidth are actively considered to prevent overload and ensure quality engagement.

Equity & Transparency

Equity & Transparency

Equity & Transparency

All applicants are evaluated using the same structured framework. Matches are never influenced by payment.

Human Oversight

Equity & Transparency

Equity & Transparency

Technology supports decisions — it does not replace judgment.

Why Structure Matters

  • Mentorship operates under real constraints. Time, availability, and capacity are finite—especially for mentors balancing clinical, academic, and professional responsibilities.
     
  • Unstructured matching creates hidden inequities. Informal or ad-hoc processes often advantage visibility or speed rather than alignment, readiness, or need.
     
  • Standardization promotes fairness. A consistent evaluation framework ensures that every participant is considered thoughtfully and equitably within each matching cycle.
     
  • Programs succeed at the cohort level. Effective matching accounts for overall balance, sustainability, and mentor engagement—not just individual preferences in isolation.
     
  • Human oversight preserves nuance. Structured review allows contextual factors, special considerations, and program priorities to inform final decisions.
     
  • Stronger matches protect the relationship. When expectations, capacity, and alignment are established upfront, mentorship relationships are more likely to be durable and impactful.


Copyright © 2026 To Be an MD - All Rights Reserved.

  • Contact us

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept